Rethinking the Court Cards: They’re More Than Just People
One of the most common ways people first learn tarot is by being told that the court cards—Pages, Knights, Queens, and Kings—represent people. I was introduced to them in the same way, and many of my students come to me with the same understanding.
Just recently, a student shared that in the course they had taken, court cards were taught only as people. And while that’s a popular approach, there’s a catch—it can really limit how we interpret these powerful cards.
Court cards, like every other card in the tarot, are rich, multi-dimensional symbols. They aren’t just static labels or roles—they can represent actions, emotional states, archetypes, life stages, energies, mindsets, or even a message your higher self is trying to bring to your attention. When we see court cards only as people, we miss out on their deeper, more flexible meanings.
I know this might sound overwhelming—how can one card possibly mean so many things? But the truth is, tarot is meant to be fluid. The more possibilities you allow within your practice, the more your intuition begins to shine. Giving yourself permission to explore those layers helps you connect the dots in a reading more organically.
When we rely too heavily on memorized meanings, tarot can actually feel harder to learn. It becomes rigid, and you might find yourself asking, “Should I trust my intuition or stick to what I memorized?” That hesitation can hold you back from building a personal, intuitive relationship with your deck—something every reader needs over time.
So where did the idea come from that court cards are people?
This belief has deep roots. Tarot originated in the 1400s in Italy as a card game, and its transformation into a divination tool took shape over the centuries. By the 1700s and 1800s, French occultists like Jean-Baptiste Alliette (Etteilla) and Antoine Court de Gébelin began writing about tarot’s esoteric potential. They associated the suits with different social roles of their time:
Batons (Wands) with farmers
Cups with clergy
Coins (Pentacles) with merchants
Swords with nobility
Later decks, like the Petit Lenormand from the 1800s, included designated cards for people, reinforcing this idea.
By the 1900s, tarot started gaining a broader audience. In 1931, W. Gurney Benham’s book Playing Cards mentioned Kings, Queens, and Knights (Knaves) as people in fortune-telling traditions.
But it was Eden Gray, through her 1970 book A Complete Guide to the Tarot, who made tarot more mainstream. Her interpretations popularized the idea of the court cards as people—assigning specific traits and even physical descriptions to each one.
So, is it wrong to read court cards as people?
Not at all. These cards are based on human roles—Kings, Queens, Knights, Pages—all rooted in history and storytelling. And sometimes, yes, they do represent a person in the querent’s life.
But we’re living in a modern, diverse world, and sticking to outdated personality profiles or physical descriptions doesn’t always reflect the situation or the people involved.
Also, not every reading is about others. Sometimes, court cards reflect your own inner landscape—parts of yourself you’re being asked to explore, nurture, or integrate. When you embrace the full spectrum of what a court card could be, your readings become richer and more meaningful.
The beauty of tarot is that it evolves with time. And so do we.
Ready to go deeper with the court cards?
If you’d like to explore practical tools and intuitive techniques to expand your understanding of the court cards, my online classes are a great place to start. You’ll learn how to break out of fixed meanings and discover new ways to bring your readings to life.
[Check out my upcoming classes here.] (insert link)
Until then, happy reading—and may your court cards speak in many voices.
With love,
Shalini
Your Tarot and Soul guide